Tabebuia lepidota: effect of nectar robbing by hummingbirds and bumblebees
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nectar robbing occurs when some floral visitors pierce the corolla of the flowers to take the nectar. It has positive effect when it facilitates the robbed species reproduction, negative when it impedes it, and neuter when it doesn't influence it. Although this phenomenon has been documented in Cuban plants, its effect in their reproductive success is still ignored. The flowers of Tabebuia lepidota present evidences of nectar robbing, by bumblebees and hummingbirds. The main objective of this investigation was to determine, in a locality, the frequency of nectar robbing of Tabebuia lepidota by each robber species, and the effect of the robbery in the reproductive success of the species. For this there were counted, in a xeromorphic thorny thicket in the ridge of Pelo Malo, Villa Clara (Cuba), the robbed and non-robbed flowers of 50 plants, and there were marked 30 flowers robbed only by hummingbirds, 30 robbed only by bumblebees and 30 without robbing evidences to evaluate the fructification. The individuals of T. lepidota presented high nectar robbing frequency, which could be due to the high production of nectar of the species, in relation to its floral neighborhood, and its capacity to resynthesize. The hummingbirds robbed more than the bumblebees, which was possibly related to the energetic requirements and the visitation rates of the robber species. T. lepidota produced similar quantities of fruits from robbed flowers that from non-robbed flowers. It was concluded that nectar robbing has neutral effect in the reproductive success of T. lepidota.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Borhidi A. 1991. Phytogeography and Vegetation Ecology of Cuba. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Capote RP, Berazaín R. 1984. Clasificación de las formaciones vegetales de Cuba. Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional. 5: 27-75.
Castro S, Silveira P, Navarro L. 2008. Consequences of nectar robbing for the fitness of a threatened plant species. Plant Ecology.199: 201-208.
Comisión Nacional de Nombres Geográficos. 2000. Diccionario Geográfico de Cuba. Ediciones GEO, La Habana.
Freeman CE, Head KC. 1990. Temperature and sucrose composition of floral nectars in Ipomopsis longiflora under field conditions. Southwestern Naturalist. 35: 423-426.
Granado L, García-Beltrán JA. 2016. Requerimientos de microhábitat de las epífitas vasculares en la zona de conservación de la Reserva Florística Manejada, Lomas de Galindo, Mayabeque, Cuba. Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional. 37: 39-46.
Greuter W, Rankin R. 2017. Plantas vasculares de Cuba: inventario preliminary. Segunda edición, actualizada, de Espermatófitos de Cuba con inclusión de los Pteridófitos. Botanischer Garten & Botanisches Museum Berlin, Berlín. DOI.org/10.3372/cubalist.2017.1
Inouye DW. 1983. The ecology of nectar robbing. En: Bentley B, Elias TS. (eds.), The biology of nectaries, 153-174, Columbia University Press, New York.
Jakobsen HB, Kristjansson K. 1994. Influence of temperature and floret age on nectar secretion in Trifolium repens L. Annals of Botany. 74: 327-334.
Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Colorado.
León Hno, Alain Hno. 1957. Flora de Cuba 4. Dicotiledóneas: Melastomataceae a Plantaginaceae. Contribuciones Ocasionales del Museo de Historia Natural, La Habana.
Maloof JE, Inouye DW. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology. 81: 2651-2661.
Martínez-Pérez L, Faife-Cabrera M. 2013. Fenología reproductiva y efecto del robo de néctar en el éxito reproductivo de Guettarda clarensis, en Santa Clara, Villa Clara, Cuba. Tesis de Diploma. Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas, Villa Clara.
Martínez-Pérez L, Faife-Cabrera M. 2018. Robo de néctar en especies de los cuabales de Santa Clara, Cuba central. Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional. 39: 83-85.
Martínez-Pérez L, Faife-Cabrera M. 2019. Robo de néctar en Guettarda clarensis (Rubiaceae): ¿importa el vecindario floral? Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional. 40: 47-57.
Navarro L. 2000. Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): Nectar robbers as pollinators. American Journal of Botany. 87: 980-985.
Navarro L, Medel R. 2009. Relationship between floral tube length and nectar robbing in Duranta erecta L. (Verbenaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 96: 92-398.
Rojas-Nossa SV. 2007. Estrategias de extracción de néctar por pinchaflores (Aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) y sus efectos sobre la polinización de plantas de los altos Andes. Ornitología Colombiana. 5: 21-39.
Rojas-Nossa SV, Sánchez JM, Navarro L. 2016. Nectar robbing: a common phenomenon mainly determined by accessibility constraints, nectar volume and density of energy rewards. Oikos.125: 1044-1055.
Silva Souza DA, Lenzi M, Orth AI. 2004. Contribuição à ecologia da polinização de Tabebuia pulcherrima (Bignoniaceae) em Area de restinga, no sul de Santa Catarina. Biotemas. 17: 47-66.
Torretta JP, Cerino MC. 2013. Biología reproductiva de tres especies simpátricas de Bignoniaceae en Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. 48: 73-89.
Yan-Wen Z, Qian Y, Ji-Min Z, You-Hao G. 2009. Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems. Annals of Botany. 104: 33-39.
Ye ZM, Jin XF, Wang QF, Yang CF, Inouye DW. 2017. Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees. Annals of Botany. 119:1053-1059.